RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02165
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His Reentry (RE) code of 2X (First-term, second-term or career
airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the
Selective Re-enlistment Program (SRP)) be changed.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He was separated with a honorable discharge due to force
management and should be eligible to reenlist.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicants military personnel records indicate he enlisted
in the Regular Air Force on 23 Jul 02.
On 16 Jun 10, the applicants supervisor non-recommended him for
reenlistment and, on the same day, the applicants commander
non-selected him for reenlistment. In doing so, the commander
indicated the applicant displayed a continual pattern of conduct
that falls short of the Air Force Core Values, noting that he
was involved in a domestic dispute with his wife that required
police response, lying to his wife about being on a temporary
duty assignment, for which he received a Letter of Counseling
from a previous commander, and was 60 days delinquent in the
payment of his government travel card.
On 24 Jun 10, the applicant acknowledged receipt and elected not
to appeal the commanders decision.
On 31 Aug 10, the applicant was furnished an honorable discharge
and was credited with eight years, one month, and eight days of
total active service.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are
described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of
primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial, indicating the applicant has not
provided any proof of an error or injustice in reference to his
RE code. His non-selection for re-enlistment was carried out in
accordance with AFI 36-2606, Reenlistment in the USAF, which
indicates that commanders have selective reenlistment or non-
selection authority. The applicant was discharged under the
FY10 Air Force Shaping Rollback Program. The applicant was in
his reenlistment window but was denied reenlistment, which
required him to separate under the rollback guidance.
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The applicant states that when he was informed that he was going
to be separated under the FY10 Force Shaping Rollback Program,
he contacted the Area Defense Counsel (ADC) and was informed
that he was unable to appeal the process because he had
previously been placed on a control roster. They informed him
that he would get an honorable discharge and could later join
the Guard or Reserve if he wanted to do so. When he received
his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active
Duty, he saw the RE code but did not know that it would preclude
him from future service.
In Apr 13, he applied for an Air National Guard (ANG) position,
but was informed that his RE code rendered him ineligible to
enlist. His time in the Air Force was rewarding and honorable
and he should be allowed to continue to progress in his career
as a member of the Air Force (Exhibit E).
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took
notice of the applicants complete submission, including his
rebuttal response, in judging the merits of the case; however,
we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force
office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt its rationale
as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the
victim of an error of injustice. Therefore, in the absence of
evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting
the relief.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2013-02165 in Executive Session on 4 Feb 14, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 29 Apr 13, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 6 Jun 13.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 21 Jun 13.
Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 18 Jul 13.
Panel Chair
3
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00845
The applicants complete submission is at Exhibit A. His supervisor non-recommended him for the selective reenlistment program and his commander non-selected him for reenlistment on 26 March 2010. As of this date, this office has received no response.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02475
The complete DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit B. He has never done any of the actions he was accused of by the three airmen. Moreover, he has not provided substantial evidence that but for the Article 15 he would have been selected for reenlistment.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02787
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02787 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code of 2X, which denotes "1st term, 2nd term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the selective reenlistment program (SRP)," be changed to allow his reentry into the military. On 17 Feb 2011, the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02391
On 7 September 2010, he was notified that his supervisor not recommended him for reenlistment. The applicant was discharged on 31 May 2011 under the FY11 Air Force Shaping Rollback Program after serving 3 years, 9 months and 3 days. The applicant provides no proof of an error or injustice in reference to his RE code and his non-selection for reenlistment was in accordance with current guidance.
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04395
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which are attached at Exhibits C and D. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOS recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. Therefore, we believe the applicants records should be corrected as indicated below. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02620
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility, which are attached at Exhibits C and D. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFLOA/JAJM recommends denial of the applicants request to set aside his NJP, indicating the applicant has not shown a clear error or injustice. He was later informed that the commander had made his decision to impose...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02198
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02198 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His separation code of JGH (non-retention on active duty) and his Reentry (RE) code of 2X (First-term, second-term, or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP))be changed so that he can enlist in the Air National Guard (ANG). The complete DPSOA...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05961
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05961 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code of 2X (Career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program), as reflected on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed to allow him to...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 05961
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05961 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code of 2X (Career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program), as reflected on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed to allow him to...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05133
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05133 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code 2X (first-term or second-term or career airman not selected for reenlistment) be changed. He was honorably discharged on 31 March 2012 after serving 5 years, 5 months and 7 days. We took notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with...